Small or big?
When it comes to think what will bring benefits to our professional career, personal development or that kind of important aspects of the labor market, the answer is closely related to the size of the workplace.
When talking about “size” we mean in first hand to the physical attribute of the company, and therefore to the visionary and innovative attitude of its.This topic came to my head while listening to a interview made to Bill Taylor by HBR IdeaCast podcast. Indeed, Bill has a blog at Harvardbusiness.org called Game Changer.
If you are interested, you could read the full article titled “How feedback changed the game for me” which is quite interesting.
To work at a big fully-empowered muscular company is a great opportunity to learn from many other areas despite yours. To be an employee of one of these might bring you security and calm to long-term financial worries. If you are one of those creative professionals who don’t hesitate by looking better changes to productivity, quality, service and then; a big-muscular company won’t get you realized only if it is based on innovative and leadership values.
I agree to work at mid-sized and small companies, which has a permanent focus on innovation and leading change. For example, I’m proud of a e-mail marketing company named Emma. Just take a look at the “history/people” section of their website and get an idea of what place is given to human capital, knowledge, quality at work and more.
Actually they have a blog to share their thoughts and e-mail marketing tips to clients, web surfers, competitors and everyone. Its a proof that any small, mid or big size company; can contribute to innovation and knowledge.